Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > We do have:
> > #geqo_random_seed = -1 # -1 = use variable seed
>
> > that lets you force a specific random seed for testing purposes. I
> > wonder if that could be extended to control VACUUM radomization too.
> > Right now, it just controls GEQO and in fact gets reset on every
> > optimizer run.
>
> Actually, just the other day I was thinking we should take that out.
> Since there is only one random number generator in the C library,
> GEQO is messing with everyone else's state every time it decides to do
> an srandom(). And there is certainly no need to do an explicit srandom
> with a "random" seed every time through the optimizer, which is the
> code's default behavior at the moment. That just decreases the
> randomness AFAICS, compared to letting the established sequence run.
Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
