Strange. I know we check for bison >= 1.875, and you have that, and so
do I, but I don't see those regression failures. Is it possible you
have old bison output files from an older bison release?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Conway wrote:
> When I run the regression tests against current sources, I get
> failures because bison-generated error messages use "parse
> error", not "syntax error". I vaguely recall running into
> this issue before I left for the summer -- did we resolve
> it?
>
> [neil@arch neil]$ uname -a
> FreeBSD arch.wavefire.com 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #9: Fri Jul 25 12:10:58 PDT 2003
root@arch.wavefire.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WORKSTATION-5.0-SMP i386
> [neil@arch neil]$ bison --version
> bison (GNU Bison) 1.875
> [neil@arch neil]$ flex --version
> flex version 2.5.4
>
> regression.diffs is attached.
>
> -Neil
>
> P.S. Someone should go ahead and re-generate INSTALL from
> the latest SGML: INSTALL still claims that we need bison
> 1.50 or greater.
>
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
