Re: postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 200307301019.21870.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to postgresql.conf  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Scott,

> I'm guessing OLTP needs things like FSM cranked up,
> OLAP (a for analytical) needs more shared buffers and sort memory
> Webserver might be better served just slightly higher values than default
> but well under those of either OLTP or OLAP...

Yes. Take sort_mem for example:
OLTP_SM    1024
OLTP_LM    2048
OLAP_SM    4096
OLAP_LM    16384
WWW_SM    512
WWW_LM    1024
Workstation    1024

The basic idea is:
More RAM => more sort_mem
More concurrent queries => less sort_mem
Larger data sets => more sort_mem
Lots of grouped aggregates => more sort_mem

--
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] function returning setof performance question
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql.conf