Re: reprise on Linux overcommit handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: reprise on Linux overcommit handling
Date
Msg-id 200307230301.h6N31Bq21871@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to reprise on Linux overcommit handling  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: reprise on Linux overcommit handling
List pgsql-hackers
Thanks.  Interesting.  Hard to imagine what they were thinking when they
put this code in.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> The current developer docs say this:
> 
> -------------------
> Linux has poor default memory overcommit behavior. Rather than failing if it
> can not reserve enough memory, it returns success, but later fails when the
> memory can't be mapped and terminates the application with kill -9. To
> prevent unpredictable process termination, use:
> 
>   sysctl -w vm.overcommit_memory=3
> ---------------------
> 
> This would be true if the kernel being used had the paranoid mode compiled
> in. This is not true, AFAICS, of either the stock 2.4 kernels nor of the
> latest RH kernels. It is true of 2.4.21 *with* the -ac4 (and posibly earlier
> -ac*) patch. In fact, Alan's patch apparently allows tuning of the amount of
> overcommitting allowed. As I read the kernel source I got from RH today
> (2.4.20-19.9), doing this will in fact make the kernel freely allow
> overcommiting of memory, rather than it trying in a rather unsatisfactory
> way to avoid it. IOW, with many kernels the advice would make things worse,
> not better - e.g. the RH source says this in mm/mmap.c:
> 
>         if (sysctl_overcommit_memory)
>             return 1;
> 
> 
> Rather than give bad advice, it might be better to advise users (1) to run
> Pg on machines that are likely to be stable and not run into OOM situations,
> and (2) to check with their vendors about proper overcommit handling.
> 
> Personally, my advice would be to avoid Linux for mission critical apps
> until this is fixed, but that's just my opinion, and I'm happily developing
> on Linux, albeit for something that is not mission critical.
> 
> cheers
> 
> andrew
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ang Chin Han
Date:
Subject: Re: reprise on Linux overcommit handling
Next
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: tsearch2 for 7.3.X