Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question
Date
Msg-id 200307221850.h6MIocK10571@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question  (Jord Tanner <jord@indygecko.com>)
Responses Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question  (Jord Tanner <jord@indygecko.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Jord Tanner wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 10:39, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > But CPU affinity isn't realated to hyperthreading, as far as I know.
> > CPU affinity tries to keep processes on the same cpu in case there is
> > still valuable info in the cpu cache.
> >
>
> It is true that CPU affinity is designed to prevent the dump of valuable
> CPU cache. My thought is that if you are trying to prevent CPU
> contention, you could use CPU affinity to prevent 2 postmaster processes
> from running simultaneously on the same die. Am I out to lunch here?
> I've not worked with CPU affinity before, so I'm not familiar with the
> intimate details.

I guess you could but it is the backends that use the cpu.  I don't
think manually specifying affinity will work for most applications.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Mendola Gaetano"
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong plan or what ?
Next
From: Jord Tanner
Date:
Subject: Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question