Re: Home-brewed table syncronization - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Michael A Nachbaur
Subject Re: Home-brewed table syncronization
Date
Msg-id 200307091450.32440.mike@nachbaur.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Home-brewed table syncronization  (Cliff Wells <LogiplexSoftware@earthlink.net>)
Responses Re: Home-brewed table syncronization  (Jason Earl <jason.earl@simplot.com>)
Re: Home-brewed table syncronization  (Raj Mathur <raju@linux-delhi.org>)
List pgsql-sql
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 02:28 pm, Cliff Wells wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 14:14, Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
> > So, I'm looking at syncronizing 4 tables from one master database to
> > several child databases. I'm thinking of doing the following with
> > DBD::Multiplex:
> >
> > DELETE FROM TableA;
> > INSERT INTO TableA (..) VALUES (...);
> > ....
> >
> > on all the child databases, but I'm not sure what kind of impact this
> > would have on my servers.  My impression is that this would hammer the
> > indexes, and might blow any memory optimization out the window.  Only a
> > few records in my dataset will change from time-to-time, but just the
> > process of determining what is different may take more effort than simply
> > rebuilding.
>
> Keep a timestamp associated with each record.  Only update the records
> with timestamps later than your last sync.

I'm dealing with an existing database structure that, though I can change it, 
has a lot of impact on the rest of my infrastructure.  If I can find a way of 
doing this without resorting to timestamps, I'd much rather do it that way.

-- 
/* Michael A. Nachbaur <mike@nachbaur.com>* http://nachbaur.com/pgpkey.asc*/

"Rome wasn't burned in a day. "



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Cliff Wells
Date:
Subject: Re: Home-brewed table syncronization
Next
From: Jason Earl
Date:
Subject: Re: Home-brewed table syncronization