Re: OSF build broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kurt Roeckx
Subject Re: OSF build broken
Date
Msg-id 20030707063041.GA18871@ping.be
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OSF build broken  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: OSF build broken
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:46:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com> writes:
> > And on RedHat 7.3 it's in stdint.h - they must move it around to keep the 
> > snipers guessing.
> 
> Sometimes it seems that way :-(
> 
> > What's the best (most portable) way to fix this?
> 
> My vote is to rip out every last reference to int64_t and other
> system-header-dependent datatypes.  These were added in the recent
> IPv6 changes, and I thought at the time that they'd not stand the
> test of portability, but I kept quiet for lack of evidence.  Now
> there is some.  I recommend sending in a patch that replaces int64_t
> with int64, and likewise for anything you don't see defined or used
> in src/include/c.h.  The stuff in c.h has been through the wars
> already, the IPv6 code has not.

I used int64_t because that's standard (C99).  But int64 will do
too.


Kurt



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: regressions tests on freebsd/alpha: failure
Next
From: Philip Yarra
Date:
Subject: Re: OSF build broken