On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:27:09 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I tried to implement LRU-2 awhile ago, and got discouraged when I
> couldn't see any performance improvement. But I was using pgbench as
> the test case, and failed to think about its lack of seqscans.
How about cache hit rate?
> BTW, when you were running your test case, what shared_buffers did you
> use?
I use 16,64,256 and 4096.
---
Yutaka tanida<yutaka@hi-net.zaq.ne.jp>
