Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From nolan@celery.tssi.com
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
Date
Msg-id 20030624153134.5907.qmail@celery.tssi.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting  ("Arjen van der Meijden" <acm@tweakers.net>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
List pgsql-advocacy
> There also ssh clients which support X11 forwarding on a windows machine
> and since there are X11 servers for windows...
> You don't necessarily need a unix workstation. Apart from that, a
> (tight)vnc server might be less bandwidth consuming.

I've always figured X11 was proof that you can never have a fast enough
CPU or enough memory.  :-)

I've tried X11 across a DSL line, it gives a whole new meaning to the
word slow.  I wound up creating a SSH tunnel to a browser inside the
client's firewall, a solution neither of us are entirely happy with,
as it may have some security concerns.  We're probably setting up a VPN
connection, but that's hung up in accounting.

My point is that solutions which require other technology just to install
or use, whether that be a simple browser or X11, can be self-defeating.

If we're trying to sell ourselves to the PHP and/or MySQL communities,
needing or even recommending X11 isn't the direction we should be going.
--
Mike Nolan


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: enabling postgresql by default
Next
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: enabling postgresql by default