Re: [BUGS] again: Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: [BUGS] again: Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW
Date
Msg-id 20030623.171725.34767121.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: again: Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW toUTF-8  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > > Copy to table (DB has UTF-8 encoding) from file:
> > > > for PGCLIENTENCODING=BIG5:
> > > > WARNING:  copy: line 1, LocalToUtf: could not convert (0xf9d6) BIG5 to UTF-8. Ignored
> > > > WARNING:  copy: line 2, LocalToUtf: could not convert (0xf9d7) BIG5 to UTF-8. Ignored
> > > > WARNING:  copy: line 3, LocalToUtf: could not convert (0xf9d8) BIG5 to UTF-8. Ignored
> > > > WARNING:  copy: line 4, LocalToUtf: could not convert (0xf9db) BIG5 to UTF-8. Ignored
> > > 
> > > I see no problem here. The only standard conversion map I could found
> > > on-line form so far (see below URL) does not include entries 0xf9d6 or
> > > above.
> > 
> > Sorry, I do not know anything about conversion maps and CNS 11643-1993 planes.
> > I only got a file in BIG5 encoding from Taiwan and found that it is not possible
> > to load all text to postgresql 7.3.3.
> > But it is possible to convert to UTF-8 with iconv tool from glibc (Linux).
> > It would be good if next release supports todays BIG5.
> 
> I'm not looking forward to add any conversion entries confirmed by
> standards. Can some one explain me the current status of the

Oops. above should be: 

I'm not looking forward to add any conversion entries NOT confirmed by
standards.

> conversion maps between BIG5 and Unicode? The only info I could found
> so far is in www.unicode.org.
> --
> Tatsuo Ishii
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
> 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: again: Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW toUTF-8
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: what is the meaning of "schema"?