On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:09:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be> writes:
> > I just saw in the cvs web that you changed freeaddrinfo2 to not
> > have the hint af anymore, and use the one from the struct addrinfo
> > itself.
>
> > This can break things. If you called getaddrinfo2() with
> > AF_UNSPEC, the version from the system can return an AF_UNIX
> > socket. For instance glibc 2.1 will do that.
>
> If this is broken then it's probably not the only problem --- we rely on
> sa.sa_family in other places.
sa.sa_family is not the problem itself, the problem is that if
you use getaddrinfo with AF_UNSPEC, you can get more than replies
with more than 1 address family. You will get atleast AF_INET,
AF_INET6 if they exist for what you request, and maybe AF_UNIX or
even others.
Kurt
