Re: Win32 patch to allow compilation - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Win32 patch to allow compilation
Date
Msg-id 200305191745.h4JHjtJ01411@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Win32 patch to allow compilation  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I don't think 'win' is unique enough.  Win32 seems the more official
> > designation.
>
> We've lived with a "win" port for years and no one complained about that.
> And what will happen when "win64" comes around?  The official designation
> is Windows anyway.

OK, I have renamed win32_include to win32.  I used win32 because that is
the symbol we test for in the C code, so it seemed it made sense to be
consistent.  How about MSWIN?  That is more unique than win.  What
symbol do we test for in the C code?  __mswin__?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Jason Tishler
Date:
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 patch to allow compilation