Re: Replication for a large database - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: Replication for a large database
Date
Msg-id 20030507222653.T728@hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replication for a large database  (Michael A Nachbaur <mike@nachbaur.com>)
List pgsql-sql
Postgres-R is not pgsql.com's product ... eRServer is ... the code that is
in product has been quite extensively pounded on by both the .org and
.info registries ...


On Mon, 5 May 2003, Michael A Nachbaur wrote:

> IIRC, pgsql.com's product (Postgres-R I think it's called) is based on
> PostgreSQL-6.4.2, which won't work for me since I use a lot of features
> available only in the 7.x generation.
>
> I'm using the Rserv code from the contrib section of Postgres, and that's what
> I'm having problems with.
>
> On Monday 05 May 2003 10:30 am, Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote:
> > Have u tried the Rserv solution which pgsql.com provides
> > commercially? I have heard its pretty good.
> >
> >
> > regds
> > mallah.
> >
> > On Mon, 5 May 2003, Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I apologize if this has already been covered in the past, but I couldn't
> > > seem to find an adequate solution to my problem in the archives.
> > >
> > > I have a database that is used for a bandwidth tracking system at a
> > > broadband ISP.  To make a long story short, I'm inserting over 800,000
> > > records per day into this database.  Suffice to say, the uptime of this
> > > database is of paramount importance, so I would like to have a more
> > > up-to-date backup copy of my database in the event of a failure (more
> > > recent than my twice-per-day db_dump backup).
> > >
> > > I have two servers, both Dual Xeon-2G with 4G of RAM, and would like to
> > > replicate between the two.  I would like to have "live" replication, but
> > > I couldn't seem to find a solution for that for PostgreSQL.  I tried
> > > RServ but, after attempting it, I saw a mailing list posting saying that
> > > it is more-or-less useless for databases that have a large number of
> > > inserts (like mine).
> > >
> > > When I perform a replication after a batch of data is inserted, the query
> > > runs literally for hours before it returns.  I have never actually been
> > > present during the whole replication duration since it takes longer than
> > > my 8-12 hour days here at work.
> > >
> > > Is there any replication solution that would fit my needs?  I'm taking
> > > advantage of some PG7.2 features so "downgrading" to the 6.x version of
> > > postgres that has replication support isn't an option.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > --man
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>
>

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Randall Lucas
Date:
Subject: Re: Unanswered Questions WAS: An unresolved performance problem.
Next
From: Wei Weng
Date:
Subject: Re: help database corruption