Re: Should we SetQuerySnapshot() between actions of a rule? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: Should we SetQuerySnapshot() between actions of a rule?
Date
Msg-id 20030501175900.GO10033@libertyrms.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we SetQuerySnapshot() between actions of a rule?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 01:35:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Can't you get the consistent snapshot by running SERIALIZABLE anyway?
> 
> Yeah, but that may do more than you want (like force a rollback on
> update conflicts...)

True enough, but that's the same problematic choice you have in an
interactive session (unless I misunderstood).

A

-- 
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS                           Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8                                        +1 416 646 3304
x110



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Neil Conway"
Date:
Subject: Re: FOR EACH STATEMENT triggers
Next
From: David Walker
Date:
Subject: Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ?