OK. I understand what you mean. I was really focussing
on the engine handling rather than the application behaviour.
elein
On Thursday 24 April 2003 21:03, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 24 April 2003 08:28 pm, elein wrote:
> > I don't think this is a bug at all.
> > Argument creation has to come before the execution
> > of the function. That in this case the argument is a row type
> > doesn't matter. It has nothing to do with the content of the
> > function and everything to do with creating the row NEW.
> > How can you possibly assign a value to NEW.bar if NEW as
> > a whole does not exist?
>
> You misunderstood. I don't think it's a bug in postgresql, it's a bug in
> the application that is hitting against my database. When it doesn't have a
> value for the timestamp field, it either needs to drop it from the insert
> statment or convert it to null; not send a ''
>
> > What are you really trying to do here? Maybe setting the
> > table column's default to NULL will achieve what you want.
>
> I have an application that is inserting information into a table
> periodically. Sometimes it passes in timestamps for certain fields, but
> sometimes it doesn't have any timestamp information. When it doesn't have
> information, it should send NULL. Unfortunatly the app writers wrote it to
> send ''. Default's don't work because the app is trying to post data, it's
> just not a valid datatype. Luckily in this instance I can tell the app
> guys they have to fix thier app instead of having to muck up the database.
>
> Robert Treat
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
elein@varlena.com Database Consulting www.varlena.com
I have always depended on the [QA] of strangers.
