On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 11:09:41AM -0400, Johnson, Shaunn wrote:
> A few nights ago, I was in the middle of building a new
> table when I noticed that there were a lot of idle instances
> and my table was waiting to be built (I believe the message
> statement was WAITING or the like).
The simple <idle> transactions wouldn't cause anyboy to wait.
Something must've been inside a transaction.
> I am looking at the log file for PG and see a lot of 'BackendStartup:
> forked pid=### socket=XXX' messages and I wonder if I
> did the right thing.
That's the connections coming in. Totally normal if you have the
right sort of logging options turned on.
> My question: Should I *not* kill idle processes even though they
> my interfere with building / modifying tables? What are the
> ramifications for such an act?
Truly idle (i.e. not in a transaction) processes shouldn't cause a
problem such as you describe.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
