Re: [GENERAL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used
Date
Msg-id 20030408234623.GD15928@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used  ("Denis @ Next2Me" <denis@next2me.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 12:57:16PM -0700, Denis wrote:
> The query I am trying to do (fast) is:
>
> select count(*) from addresses;
>
> This takes more than a second to complete, because, as the 'explain' command
> shows me,
> the index created on 'addresses' is not used, and a seq scan is being used.
> One would assume that the creation of an index would allow the counting of
> the number of entries in a table to be instantanous?

Incorrect assumption. select count(*) can produce different results in
different backends depending on the current state of the active
transactions.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> "the West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or
> religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence.
> Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do."
>   - Samuel P. Huntington

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
Next
From: "Denis @ Next2Me"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used