Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200304011754.h31HsjM25421@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 (Shankar K <shan0075@yahoo.com>) |
List | pgsql-performance |
I have heard XFS with the mount option is fastest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shankar K wrote: > hi jeff, > > go to > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/docs/momjian/hw_performance/ > under 'filesystems' slide. > > snip > > File system choice is particularly difficult on Linux > because there are so many file system choices, and > none of them are optimal: ext2 is not entirely > crash-safe, ext3, XFS, and JFS are journal-based, and > Reiser is optimized for small files and does > journalling. The journalling file systems can be > significantly slower than ext2 but when crash recovery > is required, ext2 isn't an option. If ext2 must be > used, mount it with sync enabled. Some people > recommend XFS or an ext3 filesystem mounted with > data=writeback. > > /snip > > --- "Jeffrey D. Brower" <jeff@pointhere.net> wrote: > > What is the URL of that article? I understood that > > ext2 was faster with PG > > and so I went to a lot of trouble of creating an > > ext2 partition just for PG > > and gave up the journalling to do that. Something > > about double effort since > > PG already does a lot of that. > > > > Bruce, is there a final determination of which is > > faster/safer? > > > > Jeff > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Shankar K" <shan0075@yahoo.com> > > To: <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org> > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:55 PM > > Subject: [PERFORM] ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 > > > > > > > hi there, > > > > > > I was reading bruce's 'postgresql hardware > > performance > > > tuning' article and he has suggested ext3 > > filesystem > > > with data mode = writeback for high performance. > > > > > > I would really appreciate if anyone could share > > your > > > experiences with ext3 from a production stand > > point or > > > any other suggestions for best read/write > > performance. > > > > > > Our applications is an hybrid of heavy > > inserts/updates > > > and DSS queries. > > > > > > version - postgres 7.3.2 > > > hardware - raid 5 (5 x 73 g hardware raid), 4g > > ram, 2 > > > * 2.8 GHz cpu, redhat 7.3 > > > > > > Note : we don't have the luxury of raid 1+0 > > (dedicated > > > disks) for xlog and clog files to start with but > > may > > > be down the line we might look into those options, > > but > > > for now i've planned on having them on local > > drives > > > rather than raid 5. > > > > > > thanks for any inputs, > > > Shankar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, > > live on your desktop! > > > http://platinum.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > broadcast)--------------------------- > > > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to > > majordomo@postgresql.org > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more > http://platinum.yahoo.com > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
pgsql-performance by date: