How can it recurse, actually - there won't be an index with the same name
in the subtable?
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:21:16AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Does the new ALTER TABLE / CLUSTER ON syntax support the ONLY modifier - it
> > isn't documented if it is?? I guess it's not really relevant is it?
>
> Oh, sorry, the command does not recurse. Should it? The whole CLUSTER
> thing does not recurse -- in fact that's why I didn't make the ALTER ...
> CLUSTER ON version do it, but maybe it should.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
> "El destino baraja y nosotros jugamos" (A. Schopenhauer)
>
