Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> generalize it to understand about comments. Right now seems to be a
> >> fine time to think about this, in fact, given that we're hacking the
> >> protocol anyway.
>
> > Yes.
>
> On third thought, though, it would be really trivial for
> pg_exec_query_string to call NullCommand and fall out early if
> pg_parse_query returns an empty list; it'd take one extra test for NIL,
> which would be more than compensated for if we got rid of the strspn
> test. So maybe changing the backend is the best answer after all.
Yes, that was my original thought.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
