Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE
Date
Msg-id 200302031523.h13FNSE20027@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

    http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> writes:
> > Adds in NO MAXVALUE and NO MINVALUE options for create sequence per 200X
> > spec, which will also make alter sequence a touch easier.
>
> What are these supposed to do exactly?  There is no such animal as a
> sequence that hasn't got a maxvalue, nor one without a minvalue.
> "Large" does not mean "unlimited".
>
> I'm not eager to pick up evidently-poorly-thought-out features from a
> draft spec that is nowhere near being frozen.  Anyway, didn't we decide
> that converging syntax with 200X was a bad idea if we weren't going to
> converge semantics?
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: targetlist functions part 1 (was [HACKERS] targetlist
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SEQUENCEs and NO MAXVALUE NO MINVALUE