Re: IPv6 patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: IPv6 patch
Date
Msg-id 200301280119.h0S1JZa12808@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IPv6 patch  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: IPv6 patch
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > > However, the server log messages stating an IPv6 socket was
> > not made is
> > > > only printed if the binary supports IPv6.  The message seems to be a
> > > > compromise between those who wanted a separate IPv6 GUC/flag and those
> > > > who wanted it to silently fail on IPv6.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure.  Those who wanted silence don't get any silence and those
> > > who wanted a configurable hard failure get neither the
> > configurability nor
> > > any failure.
> >
> > That is the compromise.  Neither gets what they want, but the final
> > solution is closer to each.  This is probably the best we can do.
> 
> BTW guys, there was strong demand at Linux.conf.au asking for the 'inet'
> type to support IPv6 addresses.  I've been looking at it a bit, but I'll
> have to interleave it with my work on phpPgAdmin 3 (which rocks BTW :) ).

I had someone on the IPv6 IRC channel interested, but haven't seen any
patch yet.  It isn't that hard to do.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: IPv6 patch
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: IPv6 patch