Re: IPv6 patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: IPv6 patch
Date
Msg-id 1043719571.8713.35.camel@tokyo
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IPv6 patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: IPv6 patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: IPv6 patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 20:19, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I had someone on the IPv6 IRC channel interested, but haven't seen any
> patch yet.  It isn't that hard to do.

If we cleanly split the Postgres-specific code from the stuff that's
been imported from BIND, shouldn't it be easy to import new versions,
and thus get IPv6 support for free?

Or at least, that's what I vaguely recall Paul Vixie saying on
pgsql-patches a while ago:


http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=200202221828.g1MISX102055%40candle.pha.pa.us&rnum=2&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dpaul%2Bvixie%2Bgroup:comp.databases.postgresql.patches%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D200202221828.g1MISX102055%2540candle.pha.pa.us%26rnum%3D2

Cheers,

Neil
-- 
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: IPv6 patch
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: IPv6 patch