Re: IPv6 patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: IPv6 patch
Date
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOIEDECFAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IPv6 patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: IPv6 patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > However, the server log messages stating an IPv6 socket was
> not made is
> > > only printed if the binary supports IPv6.  The message seems to be a
> > > compromise between those who wanted a separate IPv6 GUC/flag and those
> > > who wanted it to silently fail on IPv6.
> >
> > I'm not sure.  Those who wanted silence don't get any silence and those
> > who wanted a configurable hard failure get neither the
> configurability nor
> > any failure.
>
> That is the compromise.  Neither gets what they want, but the final
> solution is closer to each.  This is probably the best we can do.

BTW guys, there was strong demand at Linux.conf.au asking for the 'inet'
type to support IPv6 addresses.  I've been looking at it a bit, but I'll
have to interleave it with my work on phpPgAdmin 3 (which rocks BTW :) ).

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Fix for log_min_error_messages
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: IPv6 patch