Re: postmaster.pid - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dan Langille
Subject Re: postmaster.pid
Date
Msg-id 20030103173657.O91507-100000@m20.unixathome.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postmaster.pid  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: postmaster.pid
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Note also that under most circumstances, a stale postmaster.pid file
> should not prevent the postmaster from starting (because it will ignore
> the old .pid file if it can see that there is no process with that PID
> alive anymore).  The case where you lose is only when there is another
> process running that by chance has the same PID that was assigned to the
> old postmaster on the system's previous uptime cycle.  The postmaster
> can't tell that such a process isn't really a conflicting postmaster,
> so it gives up for safety's sake.

This is a situation which I've often wondered about, for other scripts,
not PostgreSQL.  I've not found a happy solution yet.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: Re: How to backup a postgreSQL of 80 GByte ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: postmaster.pid