Re: Suggestion; "WITH VACUUM" option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Suggestion; "WITH VACUUM" option
Date
Msg-id 200212161425.59402.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Suggestion; "WITH VACUUM" option  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Marc,

> > Easy?  Hard?  Insane?  What do you think?
>
> Just curious, but wouldn't it be just as simple to issue a VACUUM call
> right after the UPDATE/DELETE?

Well, you can't do that as part of a transaction or procedure, whereas ....

Hmmm.  Couldn't do "with vacuum" as part of a transaction, either.

Funny, it sounded like a really good idea on the phone.

In the words of Rosanne Rosanna Danna,
"Neeeveeeeeer miiiiiiiiind."

--
-Josh BerkusAglio Database SolutionsSan Francisco



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestion; "WITH VACUUM" option
Next
From: Iavor Raytchev
Date:
Subject: pgaccess 0.98.8 - released