This is a pretty sizable patch, and there was discussion about it. Tom,
are you saying you will apply it with different syntax, or that you will
do another implementation.
I need feedback from another person before I can just reject this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
> > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> Please do not apply this. I would like to see us build something that
> complies to the SQL99 spec, instead. (I'm trying to organize some work
> along that line within the RHDB group, but no promises yet.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
