Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Shridhar Daithankar
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Date
Msg-id 200211142105.28396.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine?  ("Henrik Steffen" <steffen@city-map.de>)
List pgsql-performance
On Thursday 14 November 2002 09:01 pm, you wrote:
> this is what it look like right now... looks like 69 MB of shared memory...
> ------ Shared Memory Segments --------
> key        shmid      owner      perms      Bytes      nattch     Status
> 0x0052e2c1 131072     postgres  600        69074944   19

Well, if you sample this figure for min/max/avg usage say for a day, you will
have sufficient idea as in what are your exact requirements are in terms of
shared buffers. I would say 5% more that would prove to be much more optimal
setting. IMO it's worth of experiement..

Just start out with pretty high to leave some room..

 Shridhar


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Henrik Steffen"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Docs about buffers and sortmem setting