Re: [CYGWIN] Request for supported platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jason Tishler
Subject Re: [CYGWIN] Request for supported platforms
Date
Msg-id 20021107134248.GD1820@tishler.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Request for supported platforms  (Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
This post is just for closure -- both of the issues below have been
resolved:

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:47:35AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > 1. Cygwin bison needs to be upgraded from 1.35 to 1.75 (i.e.,
> > > 1.50+) to process src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.y
> > > successfully.  I will post to the Cygwin mailing list asking the
> > > maintainer for this upgrade.
> >
> > OK. This shouldn't stop a release though I assume, only a build from
> > CVS.
>
> Yes.  Nevertheless, I have posted my request:
>
>     http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg01740.html

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2002-10/msg00016.html

> > > 2. The following fseeko/ftello ifdef in src/include/pg_config.h.in:
> > >
> > >     #ifndef HAVE_FSEEKO
> > >     #define fseeko(a, b, c) fseek((a), (b), (c))
> > >     #define ftello(a) ftell((a))
> > >     #endif
> > >
> > > conflicts with the following Cygwin /usr/include/stdio.h entries:
> > >
> > >     int _EXFUN(fseeko, (FILE *, off_t, int));
> > >     off_t   _EXFUN(ftello, ( FILE *));
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, I'm not sure what is the best way to solve this one
> > > yet. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
> I found a solution to the above which will hopefully find its way into
> the next Cygwin release:
>
>     http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00042.html

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00089.html

Jason

--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: RC1 on Friday?
Next
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Database replication... - Mission Critica