On Wednesday 06 Nov 2002 2:01 pm, terry@ashtonwoodshomes.com wrote:
> However, for the total deficiencies I am then splitting up the total into
> aging groups, eg <30, 30-60, 60-90, and >90 days old. The query for that
> looks like the below. But before I paste it in, I would like to optimize
> it, if I could do so with a group by clause I most certainly would, but I
> don't see how I can BECAUSE OF THE AGING BREAKDOWN:
[one sub-query per age-range]
> AND dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-10-07'}
> ) AS def_count_less_30,
> AND dt.days_old_start_date >= {d '2002-10-07'}
> AND dt.days_old_start_date < {d '2002-09-07'}
> ) AS def_count_30_60,
Could you not define a function age_range(date) to return the relevant range
text, then group on that text? I've used that before.
-- Richard Huxton
