Re: User functions not displayed by \df - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: User functions not displayed by \df
Date
Msg-id 200210290326.g9T3Qeo11387@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User functions not displayed by \df  (Hadley Willan <hadley.willan@deeper.co.nz>)
List pgsql-general
This is done because most opaque functions are for internal use and not
of interest to general users.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hadley Willan wrote:
> Okay, me again. I was readin the psql source and noticed that (df)
> describeFunction explicitly excludes return type 0 which just happens to
> be opaque. I did a select on pg_proc and the functions that had the
> return type 0 happened to be returns OPAQUE.
>
> Does anybody know why this would be the case?
>
> So problem solved as I now know why my OPAQUE return type functions are
> vanishing and I have a work around, sorry to bother.
>
> H
>
> On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 14:41, Hadley Willan wrote:
> > Strange, looks like \df doesn't show functions that return the type
> > 'Opaque'?! How do I view those type of function returns?
> >
> > Thank You.
> >
> > On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 14:31, Hadley Willan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >   I was working on a database, and then I decided to cut across to a new
> > > version and import what I wanted manually. I created my new database and
> > > am now bringing across what I want from my .sql text files. These files
> > > tend to contain a table definition and any triggers and associated
> > > functions.
> > >
> > > However, in my new database, if I copy a function definition from my
> > > editor and paste it into the terminal window, it succeeds in creating
> > > it, and it works, but when I do a \df it's not shown?!
> > >
> > > If I type a new function in by hand into the terminal window, it shows
> > > up?!
> > >
> > > However, once the "ghost" function exists, even retyping it by hand does
> > > make it show up in the \df. Even dropping it and recreating it by hand
> > > does not make it show up.
> > >
> > > I've also tried piping the function in via the CLI. Again, it gets
> > > created but I still can't see it.
> > >
> > > Also, I've logged in as the "postgres" user and they can't see the
> > > functions as well. But they work?!
> > >
> > > I'm a bit confused as to why this functionality has changed and what it
> > > is that I may be doing/done wrong?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > --
> > > Hadley Willan > Systems Development > Deeper Design Limited.
> > > hadley@deeper.co.nz > www.deeperdesign.com > +64 (21) 28 41 463
> > >
> > --
> > Hadley Willan > Systems Development > Deeper Design Limited.
> > hadley@deeper.co.nz > www.deeperdesign.com > +64 (21) 28 41 463
> >
> --
> Hadley Willan > Systems Development > Deeper Design Limited.
> hadley@deeper.co.nz > www.deeperdesign.com > +64 (21) 28 41 463
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Architecture question
Next
From: evertcarton@netscape.net (Evert Carton)
Date:
Subject: Re: LDAP authentication