Hi Tom,
Le Samedi 26 Octobre 2002 16:31, Tom Lane a écrit :
> =?iso-8859-15?q?Herv=E9=20Piedvache?= <herve@elma.fr> writes:
> > Le Vendredi 25 Octobre 2002 20:17, Stephan Szabo a écrit :
> >> Are the estimated number of rows for the scan of a (4379, 3987, and 29)
> >> realistic for mynumber>(23000, 23500, 24000)
> >
> > I'm surpise about this answer for
> >
> >> 23000
> >
> > result is 98
> >
> >> 23350
> >
> > result is 96
> >
> >> 24000
> >
> > result is 93
>
> Hmm, have you "ANALYZE"d this table recently? If so it would be
> interesting to see the pg_stats row for tablea.mynumber.
Every night ...
> If the distribution of mynumber is very uneven, it might be worth
> your while to increase the statistics target for the column, so that
> the planner has more data points with which to make a better estimate.
> See ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS.
Yep done like this ... I have deleted my index on tablea on mynumber, and put
an alter table set statistics 100 ... and now it's really better !
Many thanks !
--
Hervé Piedvache
Elma Ingénierie Informatique
6 rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré
F-75008 - Paris - France
Tel. 33-144949901
fax. 33-144949902
