Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date
Msg-id 200210220152.g9M1qDJ08004@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Responses Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 20:47, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Here is a modified version of Philip's patch that has the changes Tom
> > suggested;  treating off_t as an integral type.  I did light testing on
> > my BSD/OS machine that has 8-byte off_t but I don't have 4 gigs of free
> > space to test larger files.  
> I can make an account for anyone that wants to play on UnixWare 7.1.3.

If you have 7.3, you can just test this way:1) apply the patch2) run the regression tests3) pg_dump -Fc regression
>/tmp/x4)pg_restore  -Fc  </tmp/x
 

That's all I did and it worked.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?