Re: v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 02 October 2002 11:52 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > Looks good from my end, Peter, I pulled the same docs that I pulled for
> > v7.2.2, which I hope is okay?

> Sources look okay from here.  Didn't look at the built-docs files.

Builds fine here for RPM usage.  Got an odd diff in the triggers regression 
test: did we drop a NOTICE?   If so, the regression output should probably 
have been changed too. The diff:
*** ./expected/triggers.out     Sat Jan 15 14:18:23 2000
--- ./results/triggers.out      Thu Oct  3 00:16:09 2002
***************
*** 75,91 **** insert into fkeys values (60, '6', 4); ERROR:  check_fkeys_pkey2_exist: tuple references non-existing
keyin fkeys2 delete from pkeys where pkey1 = 30 and pkey2 = '3';
 
- NOTICE:  check_pkeys_fkey_cascade: 1 tuple(s) of fkeys are deleted ERROR:  check_fkeys2_fkey_restrict: tuple
referencedin fkeys delete from pkeys where pkey1 = 40 and pkey2 = '4';
 
- NOTICE:  check_pkeys_fkey_cascade: 1 tuple(s) of fkeys are deleted
- NOTICE:  check_pkeys_fkey_cascade: 1 tuple(s) of fkeys2 are deleted update pkeys set pkey1 = 7, pkey2 = '70' where
pkey1= 50 and pkey2 = '5';
 
- NOTICE:  check_pkeys_fkey_cascade: 1 tuple(s) of fkeys are deleted ERROR:  check_fkeys2_fkey_restrict: tuple
referencedin fkeys update pkeys set pkey1 = 7, pkey2 = '70' where pkey1 = 10 and pkey2 = '1';
 
- NOTICE:  check_pkeys_fkey_cascade: 1 tuple(s) of fkeys are deleted
- NOTICE:  check_pkeys_fkey_cascade: 1 tuple(s) of fkeys2 are deleted DROP TABLE pkeys; DROP TABLE fkeys; DROP TABLE
fkeys2;
--- 75,85 ----

Tom, the timestamp and horology passes on RH 7.3 here.  Which is nice.  Will 
try 8.0 tomorrow at work.

RPMs will be uploaded either tonight or tomorrow morning after I get to work; 
it will depend on how much upload bandwidth I can get out of this dialup.  It 
appears to be running OK, so I may let it run.....
-- 
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...
Next
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?