Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...
Date
Msg-id 200210021541.g92FfnZ13393@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...  (Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Mike Mascari wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Mike Mascari wrote:
>  >>
> >>Oracle isn't processing those statements interactively. SQL*Plus 
> >>is waiting on the "/" to send the PL/SQL block to the database. 
> >>I suspect its not going to take Oracle more than a second to 
> >>insert a row...
> > 
> > 
> > Oh, I understand now.  He delayed when entering the function body, but
> > that has no effect when he sends it.  Can someone add an explicit sleep
> > in the function body and try that?
> > 
> 
> SQL> create table foo (a date);
> 
> Table created.
> 
> SQL> begin
>    2  insert into foo select sysdate from dual;
>    3  dbms_lock.sleep(5);
>    4  insert into foo select sysdate from dual;
>    5  end;
>    6  /
> 
> PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
> 
> SQL> select to_char(a, 'HH24:MI:SS') from foo;
> 
> TO_CHAR(
> --------
> 11:31:02
> 11:31:07

OK, two requests.  First, would you create a _named_ PL/SQL function
with those contents and try it again.  Also, would you test
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP too?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: Release of 7.2.3
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?