Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Date
Msg-id 200209292127.g8TLRw219816@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [SQL] arrays  (Mike Sosteric <mikes@athabascau.ca>)
List pgsql-general
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > If we change CURRENT_TIMESTAMP to statement time, I don't think we need
> > now(""), but if we don't change it, I think we do --- somehow we should
> > allow users to access statement time.
>
> I'd argue that we need the 3 kinds of now() regardless, just to limit user
> confusion.   If we set things up as:
>
> now() = transaction time
> current_timestamp = statement time
> timeofday() = exact time
>
> That does give users access to all 3 timestamps, but using a competely
> non-intuitive nomenclature.  It's likely that the three types of now() would
> just be pointers to other time functions, but would provide nomenative
> clarity.

I agree, having now() as a central place for time information is a good
idea.  Maybe we need to vote on these issues.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Next
From: Chris Hall
Date:
Subject: PL/Python