Bug #790: Optimizer does not want to use an index for large table - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Subject Bug #790: Optimizer does not want to use an index for large table
Date
Msg-id 20020929102527.BFDEA475FDD@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Bug #790: Optimizer does not want to use an index for  (Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>)
Re: Bug #790: Optimizer does not want to use an index for large table  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Jekabs Andrushaitis (jeecha@one.lv) reports a bug with a severity of 2
The lower the number the more severe it is.

Short Description
Optimizer does not want to use an index for large table

Long Description
I have a table with large number of records (100000). Data from this table is mostly selected using one field, on which
thereis an index. 
Explain plan does not show that query engine will use this index, however, which is odd, since statistics clearly show
thatindex fits in a single page, while whole table is about 600 pages. The most common select on the table would
retrieveabout 10 rows of data, and using the index would be way more efficient. I read the documentation describing
indexes,explain plans and how the statistics affects queries, and according to docs, the index should have been
used...butExplain shows that it's not. I tried dropping and re-creating the index, but still it's not used! 
I am usine PostgreSQL 7.2 on Linux Mandrake.

Sample Code
CREATE TABLE obj_props(obj_id int8,name text,value text);

for i:=0 to 10000
  for j:=0 to 10
    INSERT INTO obj_props(i,'some name','some value');

CREATE INDEX obj_props_ind1 ON obj_props(obj_id);

VACUUM ANALYZE;

EXPLAIN SELECT name,value FROM obj_props WHERE obj_id=100;

... this shows that sequential scan is used, however using index obj_props_ind1 would have been VERY efficient!

No file was uploaded with this report

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug #789: Transaction Archival Logging -- Hot Backups
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug #790: Optimizer does not want to use an index for