Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Date
Msg-id 200209252229.g8PMThL04601@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I already have a TODO item:
> >     * Return proper effected tuple count from complex commands [return]
> > I am unsure if it will be fixed in 7.3 or not.  It is still on the open
> > items list, and I think we have a general plan to fix it.
> 
> I got distracted and wasn't following the thread a few days ago about
> the topic.  Did people come to a consensus about how it should work?

Well, sort of.  It was similar to your original proposal. See the TODO
link for details.  I am heading out for 2 hours and will summarize when
I return.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)