Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Date
Msg-id 28691.1032992879@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I already have a TODO item:
>     * Return proper effected tuple count from complex commands [return]
> I am unsure if it will be fixed in 7.3 or not.  It is still on the open
> items list, and I think we have a general plan to fix it.

I got distracted and wasn't following the thread a few days ago about
the topic.  Did people come to a consensus about how it should work?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?