Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > Why exactly did you want the initial SET to not be part of the
> > transaction?
>
> Is having an exception all that bad? What other tunables should be
> outside of the reach of transactions? Maybe an exception should be
> applied to a class of SET tunables. -sc
I am fine with exceptions _if_ we force them to start a transaction,
meaning they are their own transactions basically.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
