Well, here's your problem. Using both IN (which is slow) and DISTINCT (which
is completely unnessesary).
How does this differ from:
select titolo,id,anno
from ircalend
where anno=2002
and exists (select 1 from ircalend_3 where idcalen=ircalend.id)
order by anno,titolo;
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 08:46:27AM +0200, frank_lupo wrote:
> gedis30=# explain select titolo,id,anno from ircalend where anno=2002 and id in(select distinct(idcalend) from
ircalend_3)order by anno,titolo;
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
> Sort (cost=47353.16..47353.16 rows=1 width=49)
> -> Seq Scan on ircalend (cost=0.00..47353.15 rows=1 width=49)
> SubPlan
> -> Materialize (cost=6764.58..6764.58 rows=7111 width=4)
> -> Unique (cost=0.00..6764.58 rows=7111 width=4)
> -> Index Scan using ircalend_3_idcalend on ircalend_3 (cost=0.00..6586.80 rows=71112 width=4)
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those that can do binary
> arithmetic and those that can't.
