Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > That is not the point. You are presuming that JAVA_HOME being set is a
> > > prerequisite for Ant to work, which is not the case.
> >
> > I am not. I am presuming if JAVA_HOME _isn't_ defined, ant will not
> > work.
>
> I believe that says the same thing, but it's still a faulty assumption.
> Depending on which system and distribution you use, Ant runs fine without
> JAVA_HOME being set.
Actually, it is not the same because it still goes on to test to see if
ant works. It does not assume ant works just because JAVA_HOME is
defined. In fact, ant requires version 1.5 so we have even anther test
in there before will consider Ant working.
I didn't know ant can work without JAVA_HOME defined. Let me see if I
can fiddle with the test so it throws out the Ant output on a failure
rather than testing for JAVA_HOME.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
