On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:51:08AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> writes:
> > 1/ ExecuteQuery() (line 110). Why is needful use copyObject()? The
> > PostgreSQL executor modify query planns?
>
> Yes, and yes. Unfortunately.
Hmm, it's bad. Is there any way to "fix" executor? Maybe in farfuture we will save to cache all planns and copyObject()
isnotperformance winning.
> > 2/ Lines 236 -- 245. Why do you "check for pre-existing entry of
> > same name" if you create hash table? I think better is use "else"
> > for this block of code and check it only if hash table already
> > exist.
>
> The code reads more cleanly as-is; changing it as you suggest would
> create an unnecessary interdependency between two logically distinct
> concerns.
I don't believe :-)
Karel
-- Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz,
http://mape.jcu.cz
