Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL...
Date
Msg-id 200209100257.g8A2v1408725@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL...  (Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sean Chittenden wrote:
> Hrm, I should go check the archives, but I thought what was used was
> one step below -C[fF] and was used because of size concerns for
> embedded databases.  My memory for what happens on mailing lists seems
> to be fading though so I'll look it up.

I see in parser/Makefile:
FLEXFLAGS = -CF

andifdef FLEX        $(FLEX) $(FLEXFLAGS) -o'$@' $<else        @$(missing) flex $< $@endif

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL...
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimization levels when compiling PostgreSQL...