Re: beta1 packaged - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: beta1 packaged
Date
Msg-id 200209052038.g85Kc3R17196@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: beta1 packaged  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: beta1 packaged  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > OK, so if base isn't compilable, then what is it good for?  I don't see
> > any add-on packages that would make it usable.
> 
> AFAIR, the only reason for having the split packaging is to accommodate
> people who are downloading across flaky connections --- less to retry if
> your connection drops.  You still have to download all the data if you
> want to have a useful package, no?

That was not my understanding.  If that was the issue, we would release
packages numbered 1-5.  Marc splits them up saying if you don't want the
docs, don't download them.  I assume opt is /contrib.  My guess is he
had the multibyte stuff out in /opt but now they are required.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/Perl?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Add check constraint bug