Re: beta1 packaged - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: beta1 packaged
Date
Msg-id 20020905191457.U24945-100000@hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: beta1 packaged  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: beta1 packaged  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > OK, so if base isn't compilable, then what is it good for?  I don't see
> > > any add-on packages that would make it usable.
> >
> > AFAIR, the only reason for having the split packaging is to accommodate
> > people who are downloading across flaky connections --- less to retry if
> > your connection drops.  You still have to download all the data if you
> > want to have a useful package, no?
>
> That was not my understanding.  If that was the issue, we would release
> packages numbered 1-5.  Marc splits them up saying if you don't want the
> docs, don't download them.  I assume opt is /contrib.  My guess is he
> had the multibyte stuff out in /opt but now they are required.

Actually, I just asked for the split, I think it was peter that actually
did it ... :)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: beta1 packaged
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: beta1 packaged