Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions
Date
Msg-id 200209012236.g81Ma0a26016@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> > Okay, here's a patch that implements this -- no additional changes to
> > PL/PgSQL were needed, as far as I could tell. I've added some
> > regression tests that cover this new functionality and they seem to
> > work as expected.
>
> Patch applied, with a couple minor documentation/comment fixes.
>
> At this point I believe we have full table function support (return
> a tuple, return a set, return RECORD) for SQL and plpgsql functions.
> That seems like a clean stopping point for 7.3.  But there's no
> support at all for these features in pltcl, plperl, or plpython.
> Bruce, would you add a TODO item?
>
> * Add table function support to pltcl, plperl, plpython

Added to TODO.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: create or replace rule/view (fwd)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: reindex in tab completion