Re: BLOBs - Mailing list pgsql-novice
From | AarniRuuhimäki / Megative Tmi / KYMI.com |
---|---|
Subject | Re: BLOBs |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20020816185600.QMXB29112.fep08.tmt.tele.fi@there Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: BLOBs ("Chad Thompson" <chad@weblinkservices.com>) |
List | pgsql-novice |
Hi ! With some experience and a general eye on various forums I decided some time ago not to use blobs, but a path to a file in your DB field. BR, aarni On Friday 16 August 2002 07:52 pm, you wrote: > That is exactly what i have been doing to date. I have always thought that > it would be cool to manage these files (.wav in my case) in a database, w/o > the problem of some user mucking with a directory and screwing up the > files. > > I believe that i'll give it try. > > Thanks for all your responses > Chad > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aurangzeb M. Agha" <aagha@bigfoot.com> > To: "Warwick Hunter" <whunter@agile.tv> > Cc: "Chad Thompson" <chad@weblinkservices.com>; "pgsql-novice" > <pgsql-novice@postgresql.org> > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:26 PM > Subject: Re: [NOVICE] BLOBs > > > I hope this isn't getting too academic, but why not store the path to > > blobs in the DB and access them in some other fashion? > > > > Rgs, > > Aurangzeb > > > > On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Warwick Hunter wrote: > > :Chad > > : > > :I am using PostgreSQL to store BLOBS. I can't say that the > > :performance I am getting is wonderful, but it is adequate > > :for my purposes for now. Few people are every satisfied > > :with the performance of their database anyway :-) > > : > > :I have done some performance testing on PostgreSQL and have > > :discovered that on an Linux Intel machine with reasonably fast > > :SCSI discs I can get average performance numbers like these: > > : > > :Binary BLOB Size > > :300 KB read=24 ms write=185 ms del=105 ms > > :150 KB read=11 ms write=90 ms del=51 ms > > : 5 KB read=2.5 ms write=14 ms del=11 ms > > : > > :I have done a small amount of tuning of the PostgreSQL > > :configuration. I plan to do some more. > > : > > :> Or is storing BLOBs in a DB a good idea? > > : > > :I have found PostgreSQL to be quite robust. I have a > > :test that deliberately kills the postmaster and postgres > > :subprocesses while doing write operations to see if I > > :can cause the database to be corrupted. This test > > :rarely fails. > > : > > :This test fails more regularly if you rewrite the > > :data of an existing BLOB rather than create a new > > :one and delete the old one. So now I only ever create > > :a new BLOB. > > : > > :I have seen one instance when the power on a machine > > :failed while writing a BLOB caused one BLOB to not > > :be restored correctly when the database came up. > > :I plan to investigate this and report a bug if > > :appropriate. > > : > > :I looked at the bytea data type for storing my objects > > :as regular columns. However I was unable to make it work > > :with the normal SQL statements, the binary data always > > :upset the SQL command and the escaping routines didn't > > :seem to help. > > : > > :Warwick > > > > -- > > Aurangzeb M. Agha | Email : aagha@bigfoot.com > > > > | Home : +3 010 8959.558 > > > > 34 Nafsika St. | Direct: +3 010 8995.875 > > Voula 16673 | Mobile: TBD > > Greece | Voice : 415 412 4234 (US Only) > > > > | e-Fax : 978 246.0770 > > > > PGP ID: 0x68B3A763 | > > > > "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little > > temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." > > > > - Benjamin Franklin > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
pgsql-novice by date: