Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > Well, they aren't separate fields so you can't ORDER BY domain. The dot
> > was used so it looks like a schema based on dbname.
>
> Sorry, I know it's a single field and that there is no split()
> function (that I'm aware of), but that seems like such a small and
> easy to fix problem that I personally place a higher value on the more
> standard nomeclature and use of an @ sign. I understand the value of
> . for schemas and whatnot, but isn't a user going to be in their own
> schema to begin with? As for the order by, I've got a list of users
> per "account" (sales account), so doing the order by is on two columns
> and the pg_shadow table is generated periodically from our inhouse
> tables. -sc
I have no personal preference between period and @ or whatever. See if
you can get some other votes for @ because most left @ when the ORDER BY
idea came up from Marc.
As for it being a special character, it really isn't because the code
prepends the database name and a period. It doesn't look to see if
there is a period in the already or anything.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
