On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > With FUNC_MAX_ARGS=16:
> > > (average = 28.6 seconds)
> > > With FUNC_MAX_ARGS=32:
> > > (average = 29.15 seconds)
>
> That is almost a 2 percent cost. Shall we challenge someone to get us
> back 2 percent from somewhere before the 7.3 release? Optimizing a hot
> spot might do it...
The other side of the coin ... have you, in the past, gained enough
performance to allow us a 2% slip for v7.3?
Someone mentioned that the SQL spec called for a 128byte NAMELENTH ... is
there similar for FUNC_MAX_ARGS that we aren't adhering to? Or is that
one semi-arbitrary?
